This
New York Times article does an interesting job of spotlighting the anti-gay movement. Ultimately it says that they can't believe being gay isn't a choice.
But, of course, the Christian activists aren't vague in their opposition. For them, the issue isn't one of civil rights, because the term implies something inherent in the individual -- being black, say, or a woman -- and they deny that homosexuality is inherent. It can't be, because that would mean God had created some people who are damned from birth, morally blackened. This really is the inescapable root of the whole issue, the key to understanding those working against gay marriage as well as the engine driving their vehicle in the larger culture war: the commitment, on the part of a growing number of people, to a variety of religious belief that is so thoroughgoing it permeates every facet of life and thought, that rejects the secular, pluralistic grounding of society and that answers all questions internally.
yes, that secularism will really hold the man down. You know, letting people think for themselves and not listening to some self-apppointed wizards (perhaps some call them pastors). That's the real problem for these people, they just aren't comfortable with people thinking for themselves. Groupthink is just much easier. If y ou are told what to think, there's no work for you. You can just sit back and stuff envelopes full of hate mail.
The Times article cites a Stanley Kurtz article,
"The End of Marriage in Scandinavia". He states that marriage is collapsing. Marriage rates are down, cohabitation is up, as is out-of-wedlock childbirth. He blames this on gay marriage.
However, Prof. M.V. Lee Badgett
counters these "statistics." It's really not that hard as Kurtz doesn't really bother to show causation. In fact, it's pretty easy to show that there's no causation, and indeed, not much correlation either. The marriage rates began falling in the 60s in Scandinavia, well before gays were given rights.
After the 1989 passage of the registered-partner law, the marriage rate continued to climb; Danish heterosexual marriage rates are now the highest they've been since the early 1970's. And the most recent marriage rates in Sweden, Norway, and Iceland are all higher than the rates for the years before the partner laws were passed. Furthermore, in the 1990s, divorce rates in Scandinavia remained basically unchanged.
Oh no...marriage is dying. Oh wait, what's that you say, the rates are going up. Well...well...there are tons of kids without married parents! And that is at least partially true (not that there's correlation between that and gay marriage, but there are more out-of-wedlock births), but...
Roughly half of all children in Norway, Sweden, and Denmark are now born to unmarried parents. In Denmark, the number of cohabiting couples with children rose by 25 percent in the 1990s. From these statistics Kurtz concludes that " … married parenthood has become a minority phenomenon," and—surprise—he blames gay marriage.
But Kurtz's interpretation of the statistics is incorrect. Parenthood within marriage is still the norm—most cohabitating couples marry after they start having children. In Sweden, for instance, 70 percent of cohabiters wed after their first child is born. Indeed, in Scandinavia the majority of families with children are headed by married parents. In Denmark and Norway, roughly four out of five couples with children were married in 2003. In the Netherlands, a bit south of Scandinavia, 90 percent of heterosexual couples with kids are married.
What Kurtz, and all the anti-gays miss, is that they have the causation backwards. "In truth, the shift occurred in the opposite direction: Changes in heterosexual marriage made the recognition of gay couples more likely." And that's the correlation and causation.